3) Is evasion hard (i.e. Again, pure nonsense. That was my old home ground, ie. Trains and trams are also PoP. Though next time is probably easier to just pay for the tickets if youre not trying to stain [your] record. That would move most adults onto annual passes. I will try to keep this as concise as poss - I recently got into trouble on a bus when I accidentally used my boyfriend's 16+ zip Oyster instead of mine (I have an 18+ student one). michaelrjames , youre rather confused. And Ive never seen a normal cop using a rifle. This is actually a win-win situation, because the operator gets the money early on, and the employer can save parking spaces. And the metro did develop from a tram system as was once planned for the heavier Stadtbahns. Some people will learn to dodge the inspectors, as is the case in Berlin, and thats fine; the point is not to get fare evasion to 0%, but to the minimum level net of enforcement costs. Plus, when its late at night and my phone battery is dying and Im worried about getting inspected (since my monthly pass is on my phone), reasonably bourgeois people tell me not to worry because in practice there are no inspections late at night. I would highly recommendBSB Solicitors and I am extremely grateful for alltheir help on resolving this situation so quickly. Both are negatively impacted by heavy commute subsidies. That is a ridiculous and misleading claim. Claim the Commute schemes can take the form of season tickets subsidies (STS), fare receipt claims, bike purchases, bus route subsidies, or petrol receipt claims if the job absolutely requires car transport. Most people dont get on and off along the way. People do not take mass transit at rush-hour if they can help it. Of course you need a good system. Despite your notions, the planners in HK and Singapore etc are prioritising the transit aspects with financial performance being secondary. And the S-Bahn gets subsidies because of lower suburban ridership, same as the RER/Transilien. Punishing drivers for occasional trips relative frequent transit riders also seems like a both inefficient, and politically flawed way, of encouraging switching to transit. They might have a different scheme to purely private employers. Like the time an older African-American woman got pissed off about younger African-American woman having a White boyfriend and decide to take it out on me, subjecting me to big rant on why African-American women can only really be sexually pleased by African-American men while hitting me with a plastic bottle. And I speak as a transit user. Otherwise, you just get public transport as social service for people to poor to own a car rather than a general transportation service used by everybody. This works very well in very busy systems in Asia, where they can deal with large passenger flows. If you do not reply, your case will be heard without you and this could mean you have to pay a higher fine. The Wiki section on France is truly pathetic (not worth publishing or reporting but I am sure it was): A 2009 study found that the share of immigrants in the population has no significant impact on crime rates once immigrants economic circumstances are controlled for, while finding that unemployed immigrants tend to commit more crimes than unemployed non-immigrants.[83] A study by sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, director of studies at the EHESS, found that Muslims, mostly from North African origin, are becoming the most numerous group in [French prisons].[84][85] His work has been criticized for taking into account only 160 prisoners in 4 prisons, all close to northern Paris where most immigrants live. The JR companies failures with conventional rail outside the megacities are a point of continuity with JNR not a departure. In most of the US, as you know, we need better service more than we need cheaper fares. Do you think the econometric, austerity-minded policies w.r.t. What fare evasion offences could I be prosecuted for? AAR (August 2107), BSB Solicitors are a company you can definitely put your trust in. Its not the far right or the far left, can we please keep these terms for the most radical 10-20% of the population on each side rather than for anodyne center-left and center-right politics? I wasimmediately madeto feel at ease at our first meeting and they always provided very clear instructions and advice throughout our email communications. No surprise it is one of things that makes some vote for Corbyn/Labour (re-nationalise the railways). If you have additional social goals, direct your energy towards them directly (tax credits for transit cards for low-income users or similar), and not solve them by arbitrary bulk discounts. Intuitively most of the induced extra trips, in a monthly fee, rather than pay per usage system, will be very short trips, that are easily substituted by walking or biking. You meet an interrogation window that demands what time you want to travel, or they only show a single service (Ouigo etc). London for example spends <2% of fare receipts on collection costs. A better method is to ensure most passengers have prepaid already, by offering generous monthly discounts. You need a way of preventing people to get down to the platforms. They BART charges too much, runs too little service, and its stations are too deep underground. Affordable transit, along with affordable housing, is just one thing in not only creating an equitable society, but as economists now realise (doh!) And it makes you feel that you own the city (or the IdF). If you decide to plead guilty, you can choose to go to court or not. For local operation (bus, tram, regional trains) they use vehicles which contain a passenger counting system, counting the number of people getting off and on. Fares arent the only source of revenue for the MTA; the system also earns money from tolls, taxes, government subsidies, and advertisements. But the real agenda is to crush the unions Is it even desirable to reduce commuting costs? Reddit is not a substitute for a qualified Solicitor and comments are not moderated for quality or accuracy; Any replies received must only be used as guidelines, followed at your own risk; If you receive any private messages in response to your post, please let the mods know; It is the default position of LAUK that you should never speak to the media; Check out our Common Legal Resources for helpful organisations to contact; If you do not receive satisfactory advice after 72 hours, you can let the mods know; Please provide an update at a later time by creating a new post with [update] in the title; All replies to OP must be on-topic, helpful, and legally orientated; If you do not follow the rules, you may be perma-banned without any further warning; Please include links to reliable resources in order to support your comments or advice; If you feel any replies are incorrect, explain why you believe they are incorrect; Do not send or request any private messages for any reason; Please report posts or comments which do not follow the rules. If you want to do an apples to apples comparison go find satellite data and use it. In lieu of treating it as a big intra-urban culture war, I am going to talk about best practices from the perspective of limiting revenue loss to a minimum. The total cost of the new patrol program is $56 million in the first year, escalating by 8% annually thanks to a pre-agreed pay hike scale. The flat fare is not really applicable to American cities, except possibly the Bay Area on BART. Stuff you dont have time for during the working week etc. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Why have fare collection at all. and then got arrested and taken to court when they refused to pay the outrageous fines. Beyond population density, efficiency is an important reason why transit is so cheap in East Asia. Two years ago, BART announced that it would supplement its fare barriers with proof-of-payment inspections, done by armed cops, and lied to the public about the prevalence of such a belts-and-suspenders system. what does silent notifications mean; why is there a shortage of paper towels again? That doesnt pay for itself. My fare dodges in Berlin happened once before I got monthlies and once on my way to the airport on my current trip, in a month when I didnt get a monthly since I was only in Berlin 6 days. On the subway the rate is only 4%, and there is somewhat more revenue loss on buses than on subways. Webboston college early decision acceptance rate 2025. Why should systems like the Washington Metro spend money to tear down their faregates and adopt Proof of payment, spending money to make it easier to avoid paying the fare? This split also had an effect on the policing of fare evasion, as checks used to be a LOT rarer on the S-Bahn than the U-Bahn or tram, and in my experience the inspectors also tended to be more lenient, letting people off with a warning if they had a passable excuse, which would never happen with the BVG inspectors. Or abominations on privatised lines with endless train cancellations, without refunds of course, while the train companies award their chiefs millions in bonuses, even as they continue to extract huge government subsidies (more than before privatisation!). @Henry: (Both also have the worst inequality amongst the developed world so they need to cater to the low-SES workers.) Sounds miserlyalmost Britishcompared to Paris. Anyway: the breakeven point for a zone 1-3 ticket is 48: the monthly is 158.30 with a travelcard, the peak single fare is 3.30. If you were to plead guilty at court or to be found guilty after a trial, this is a criminal conviction. Fare is split between the different agencies. The (old) UK system was the opposite of frictionless and it used to raise my temperature from rubbing up against it (not in a lacivious or frottage way! were honest, kind, warm and efficient. (The metro area mode shares are 43% and 30% respectively, but Ile-de-France has 240 annual rail trips per capita and Metro New York has about 100.). Webtfl fare evasion settle out of court. The question boils down to how New York crowding levels compare with those on the busiest urban POP line, the Munich S-Bahn trunk. WebOlliers Solicitors: Criminal Defence Law Firm Manchester & London What happens if I just ignore the Notice? The third problem could be fixed if cities actually worked to provide public restrooms either free or at a nominal cost outside every station. A 1-day Travelcard (zones 1-4) is 13.10 (14.67) (off-peak). WebFare evasion is a criminal offence and you may be prosecuted. Until recently, the GoPass was a flash pass no tagging required. And of course worse service. This is the most farcical privatisation even by the comedic standards of British railways and the aim is to defeat one of the last holdouts of organised labour I guess the numbers on Wikipedia are old, but according to its list, neither BVG nor MVV break even on fares. Based on a five-day work week, the average month has between 22 and 23 work days. Cheaper transit is promoting sprawl in both cases. BTW, where did you get that data? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/19/southern-rail-failure-crush-unions In France there are subsidies to suburban rail and buses, but the Mtro is most likely profitable by itself (the fares are barely lower than here, the operating costs are the same, passenger traffic density is a lot higher). As an operator you want monthly passes because people who have a pass are more likely to use your system in off hours when it is cheapest for you to provide service. Honestly, we are just. To add in, one more point for passes is that many operators have a special program for organizations buying them in bulk (in other words, employers can buy passes for their employees at a discount (sometimes negociated, sometimes just depending on the number of passes bought). But you dont need that many. This would be different from London, where Underground makes a sizable profit, and Overground about breaks even. Its probably one of the most American-friendly ways of encouraging more monthly distribution, since itd be hard to argue that employers shouldnt mitigate their employees commute impacts. Whats really at play is a class war issue. I had been using it for a few weeks when I was stopped by aticket inspector. What you want in terms of Get cars out of the city is a system where riders dont have to do math or stuff to consider whether they should take transit, As soon as you force them to calculate whether its worth it, theyll consider cars. Broadly: smartcards/ticket machines that actually work and are easy to use, cleaner network/new trains/reliability and half-height barriers/visible staff will do ya. After a number of years of loss-leading the commercial company goes bust or worse (see UK, though admittedly there is little competition on a route basis; they have the worst of all possible worlds) and the debacle and chaos* makes more travellers choose alternatives to rail. Are you aware of the kind of thing they subjected Season Ticket holders to from the Home Counties? Merde! Oh, and the new companies will of course order the cheapest rolling stock they can find which will mean Chinese, which in turn will reduce the profitability and scale etc of Alstom and Siemens (which arent allowed to merge to effectively compete against the likes of even more massively state-subsidised China rail companies). I concur, and Ive used London, NYC, HK, Tokyo, Shanghai, Moscow, Beijing amongst mega-city metro systems. Their policy may be concrete before electronics/operations, but much of the city isnt even close to any concrete. New Yorks 46 is still similar, esp. I was facedwith the prospect of receiving a hefty fine and a criminal record. But lets not pretend were talking about the best means of revenue collection. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. BTW Japanese policy on rail operations probably has something to do with the almost US$400 billion (yes billion) debt the government or its various proxies still carries from the privatisation of JR. Also on the geographic fact that they cant have too many people owning and using cars (in Japan you have to prove you have parking before you are allowed to even own a car; in Singapore there is a 150% tariff on cars). (Ile de France has a population density of 1010 people per sq km, that should say. In Berlin, the breakeven point is 36 trips. And therein lies the cause of the problem: the types who can think econometrically wont think in terms of long-range strategic planning (because it is impossible to quantitate neatly, and involves that nebulous thing, vision) so they do the only thing they can, which is tactical short-termism, to optimise current resources blah, blah. This was a great result and I could not be more grateful. Ill admit my attitude is very conditioned by direct experience. Regardless, its S$120 per month without discounts, whereas the longest single-ride fare is $2.08 (link 1, link 2), for a breakeven point of 58 rides a month for trips longer than about 40 km. We have utilized this guidance to seek to persuade TFL to reach an out of Court Settlement with many of our clients. WebAppearance, the Court will schedule a Settlement Conference to occur within ninety (90) days of the filing of the Notice of Limited Appearance. Heres (below) the usual b.s. In a country that has, stupidly, bet everything on London, GTR is utterly crucial to the national economy. 4) If I do it, do I THINK Im likely to get caught?, The more yes answers they reach, the LESS LIKELY they are to do it. Its because the software can only remember so many trips, right? No doubt designed and enforced by genuine elites who never intend to use the Underground themselves, except for an annual photo-op. Maybe I meant A15s? I wouldnt say that, most people are commuting from the suburbs to the center city, so on weekends the pass can be used to visit the center for shopping, cultural events, etc, not to mention any intermediate destinations along the route. Find out about prosecutions, court proceedings and how to get help with your case. Maybe we are cognitively disadvantaged in the West compared to East Asians, but I would instead argue that it is more likely that with modern technology varying fares dynamically by distance is very straightforward (with 1990s technology) and westerners would adapt very quickly. As part of a new campaign to combat fare evasion, the MTA hired new cops to police the subway. CV (July 2017), I decided to use my mothers Freedom Pass just tosave money which was a terrible mistake. (LogOut/ However Sydney had a horrendously complex British style system, and worse buses and ferries were different (and it was intended to integrate everything), and eventually they couldnt do it under the contract constraints (it was part of the reason they went bust). Extra induced trips by a switch to 0 from 0.5 a trip, are of course relatively more often going to be new 0.8 km trips than 15 km long. france.fr The official website of France. New York itself may have an excuse to keep the faregates: its trains are very crowded, so peak-hour inspections may not be feasible. Bonus! According to the present report, there is a common misunderstanding as to what commuting really is and how it should be accounted for. Of course efficiency is important but it is not achieved by those approaches, no matter how theory predicts it. Retrieved 2013-09-21. And it does an appalling job. Maybe concession fares are needed for the very poor, but the costs of even expensive transit pale in comparison to the cost of even heavily subsidized car ownership nevermind accurately priced car ownership. Not least, via job access. Likewise, even though the Helsinki Metro is profitable, it works in conjunction with buses, trams, and commuter trains that are not, its just that theres an imputation of revenues by mode/operator offered in Helsinki and (sort of) Berlin but not in Paris. A different argument against monthly passes is that be encouraging heavy rather than occasional (mixed with biking and walking) use of transit, it encourages large geographical sprawl. 95% of users would use an electronic card that you sweep when you enter and when you exit, and only know the price when they exit. Webpediag > Blog > Uncategorized > tfl fare evasion settle out of court. The second is FAR easier to deal with than the first., This is because habitual evaders will ALWAYS try to evade. With the Paris flat-fare system and immense freedom of Carte Orange, and of course that in almost every single aspect the system outperformed LU and was cheaper. Though, dare I say, and FWIW, it also perfectly correlates with the Anglosphere 250km2). The Official Site of Philip T. Rivera. A different reason to dislike monthly passes is that they work against people using bikes-walking-transit (and for that matter, cars) in different combinations. No, simply untrue assumption, and I could easily make the opposite assumption, eg. the routes that after privatisation were run as Southern. Often such pay as you go systems are implemented to cover the fact that the product (aka the service level) sucks. about improving efficiency etc that has been utterly discredited. In the vast majority of cities, no excuse exists to have any kind of overt fare control. Germany is very law-abiding in stereotype. Yeah, better than they used to be, but still expensive and some conditional travel. They were technically convenient before modern technology (and thus motivated historically), but today there is no excuse to not have payments per trip, and per distance (and preferably also extra in rush hour). I suppose one possible rationale is that in other old, established countries most people consider their nation to be their ancestral home, and so resent interlopers (and contrive to keep them poor & marginalised), while in the New World, almost everyone knows they come from somewhere else in relatively recent history, and it is accepted norm that the new arrivals will quickly integrate just like all of us have done.
tfl fare evasion settle out of courtLeave A Reply